首页> 外文OA文献 >Transrectal ultrasonography can safely replace cystography in assessing vesico-urethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy
【2h】

Transrectal ultrasonography can safely replace cystography in assessing vesico-urethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy

机译:经直肠超声检查可以在前列腺癌根治术后评估膀胱尿道吻合情况时安全地替代膀胱造影

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: A well performed vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) allows an early catheter removal and cystography is mandatory to exclude urinary extravasation. Aim of the study is to investigate whether transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is as reliable as cystography in detecting anastomotic leakage after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) in order to avoid the use of X-rays. Methods: 50 patients (pts) underwent RRP. VUA integrity was assessed 7 days after surgery by cystography and subsequently by TRUS to assess the patency of VUA. Patients who showed extravasation at the cystogram underwent ultrasonography in order to evaluate the leakage shown with cystography. Results: Catheter was removed after 7 days in all patiens except 2 pts (4%) showed extravasation at the cystography that was exactly detected at the TRUS investigation, therefore the catheter was maintained for another week. TRUS investigation, performed after cystography, also revealed the presence of a lymphocele and a retropubic hematoma, in two different patients, both completely asymptomatic and misdiagnosed at the cystography. Conclusions: Urinary leakage in the first days after RRP can be frequent and cystography is mandatory to assess VUA integrity, when early catheter removal is planned. TRUS as an alternative investigation technique to cystography, showed a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting extravasation and was also able to diagnose complications related to RRP that cystography didn't show.
机译:目的:良好的膀胱尿道吻合术(VUA)可以及早取出导管,并且必须行膀胱造影以排除尿液外渗。这项研究的目的是调查在彻底进行耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)后检测直肠吻合口漏出时,经直肠超声检查(TRUS)是否与膀胱造影检查一样可靠,从而避免使用X射线。方法:50名患者(点)接受了RRP治疗。术后7天通过膀胱造影术评估VUA完整性,随后通过TRUS评估VUA的通畅性。膀胱造影显示有渗出的患者接受超声检查以评估膀胱造影显示的渗漏。结果:所有患者中的导管均在7天后摘除,只有2分(4%)的患者在TRUS检查中准确地发现了在膀胱造影上发现的渗出液,因此将导管再维持一周。膀胱造影后进行的TRUS调查还发现,在两名完全无症状且在膀胱造影上被误诊的患者中,存在淋巴膨出和耻骨后血肿。结论:在计划早期拔除导管时,RRP最初几天的尿液渗漏可能很频繁,必须行膀胱造影以评估VUA完整性。 TRUS作为膀胱造影的替代检查技术,在检测外渗方面显示出高灵敏度和特异性,并且还能够诊断与膀胱造影未显示的RRP相关的并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号